Engagementworks
Phone: +64 22 198 5043
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Services
    • Audit & Review Services
    • Community engagement checklist
    • Significance & Engagement Resource Kit
    • Resources and Links
  • Buy Community Engagement Basics Online
  • Community Engagement Basics Online
    • Introduction
    • Session 1
    • Session 2
    • Session 3
    • Session 4
    • Session 5
    • Session 6
    • Session 7
    • Session 8
    • Session 9
    • Bonuses
  • Our Training >
    • Short Courses >
      • Governance & leadership (LS-010)
      • Engagement overview (LS-020)
      • Social media for leaders (LS-030)
      • Preparing an engagement strategy (PS-010)
      • Preparing an engagement plan (PS-020)
      • How to use the engagement toolbox (PS-030)
      • How to use engagement planning templates (PS-040)
      • Understanding & planning internal engagement (PS-050)
      • Understanding & using online engagement tools & social media (PS-060)
      • Engagement tips & tricks (PS-070)
      • Engagement case studies (PS-080)
      • Dealing with engagement conflict (PS-090)
    • Practitioner Workshop Series >
      • Community Engagement 101
      • Community Engagement Basics (Local Government)
    • Governance Workshop
    • Training Photo Gallery
  • Our Free Stuff
  • Our Blog
  • Case Studies >
    • Invercargill City's Caravan
    • Sport Bay of Plenty's GO4it Programme
    • Wellington region local government reform
    • Newcastle's fig trees
    • Sport Waitakere's 8M8s
  • Our Newsletters
  • Contact Us

Run a flag up a pole and see who salutes

19/2/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
What has become a perennial issue for New Zealanders – the adequacy of our nation’s flag – has emerged once again. Voices in favour and against are gargling in readiness for the inevitable emotive debate that should be accompanied by a robust community engagement process. Whether or not either of those happens remains to be seen.

National identity symbolised by the country’s flag is something that some people are passionate about. On one hand there are those who don’t see a need for change. On the other are those who want to see New Zealand stand clearly apart from other countries who have copied our flag, such as Australia!

So what could an ideal community engagement process entail?

Given that democracy should be a key driver of significant change, then the people of New Zealand need a chance to have their say. This process needs to be more robust than a referendum or general election promise.

A first step should involve looking beyond a “squeaky wheel syndrome” and finding out if there really is a significant desire for change. “Significant” should be more than a simple majority. If there isn’t such a desire, end of story. The status quo should prevail. A case as important as this may need New Zealanders to determine what the magical number defined as “significant” is, before anything happens.

If there is a desire for change, then a robust process needs to follow to identify the key elements for a new New Zealand flag. A number of options get trotted out each time this issue reappears but there may be something even better as yet undeveloped.

A design competition encompassing these key elements could be used to identify leading contenders, with the most popular facing off in some sort of popularity contest.

Ideally this should be a process that isn’t rushed. A famous cheese manufacturer often tells us that “good things take time”. Something as important as a national flag which should endure for many future generations of New Zealanders must be no exception.

This must not be done on the cheap. It needs to involve a well-resourced process that actively engages with New Zealanders and other potentially affected stakeholders or groups with an interest in us and our flag. Our Pacific neighbours are but one example. Some sort of comprehensive “brand audit” to find out where and how our current flag is used may produce some interesting results.

Any engagement toolbox should make strong use of online tools, but not rely exclusively on those.

Moderated online discussion forums could be used constructively to tease out many issues, like whether there is a compelling need for change and, if there is, identifying the design brief against which all existing and new alternative designs can be evaluated.

Face-to-face engagement should also be used, particularly for groups who prefer to share ideas in this manner. Māori and Pacific Island groups are examples, so too are school children and aged people.

Whatever engagement tools are used, they must reflect community preferences to ensure that all barriers to participation are removed. There are important cultural and mechanical considerations when developing an all-encompassing and robust engagement process, which must be the basis on which a discussion as important as our nation’s flag is conducted.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Authors

    Brett & Don share their thoughts. Engagement isn't always the only thing that excites them!

    Archives

    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013

    Categories

    All
    Advice
    Ideas
    Opinion
    Tools

    RSS Feed

Picture
Engagementworks
© 2023